reply
medium
1999-02-11
Supreme People's Court's Reply on the Legal Effect of a Borrower's Signature or Seal on a Payment Reminder Notice After the Statute of Limitations Has Expired
最高人民法院关于超过诉讼时效期间借款人在催款通知单上签字或者盖章的法律效力问题的批复
最高人民法院
npc
This document clarifies that a borrower's signature or seal on a payment reminder notice after the statute of limitations has expired does not constitute a renewal of the debt obligation, and the creditor's claim remains unenforceable.
Document Text
Body text not yet extracted. View on original site
Topics
statute of limitations
debt enforcement
judicial interpretation
Metadata
| Publisher | 最高人民法院 |
| Site | npc |
| Date | 1999-02-11 |
| Category | major_policy |
| Policy Area | 诉讼时效 |
| CMS Category | 高法司法解释 |
| Keywords | effective:1999-02-16 |
Verification